Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MAKO Surgical Corp.
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep per (at least) WP:CSK #4. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:46, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- MAKO Surgical Corp. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I love Wikipedians, for other user, Mister Suitcase right here edit, but revision restored, but MAKO Surgical Corp. was acquired by Stryker which no longer traded, the acquisition includes RIO and RESTORIS, and added aftermath section has been restored, and Sid Caesar died on 2014. 4KidsFriend (talk) 22:12, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. 22:21, 13 October 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.244.80.11 (talk)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 October 13. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:36, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 03:12, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 03:12, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment. Once notable, always notable. The fact that the company was acquired by another one is worth mentioning in the article, but isn't a reason to delete the article. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 04:13, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I don't see any reason to delete, the Stryker Corporation is already wordy and doesn't need more content merged into it. NemesisAT (talk) 12:05, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Blocked sock --Blablubbs (talk) 10:50, 16 October 2021 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
- Keep - Clearly meets WP:GNG. There's a lot of socking going on here. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:59, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep: Per WP:SKCRIT#3 and 4: bad-faith and completely erroneous nomination by a block-evading sockpuppet. JavaHurricane 12:24, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: added why the 2013 acquisition by Stryker remains notable and important to the company's direction, citing four recent articles. I got a warning of an unreliable source but haven't been able to find which one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AggressivelyTacky (talk • contribs) 21:59, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.